One patient · one record

Four sites. One attested record.

The brands look separate — a triage site, a class, a coach, a surgeon tool. They are four roles in a single patient record. Follow one episode from first symptom to final code: at every step the model proposes, a check that is not the model verifies, a named human signs, and a hash seals it. The receipts chain into one longitudinal, audit-survivable record.

Synthetic patient · demonstration only · not coding or medical advice
PatientR. Vance, 64 F
ConditionR knee OA · K-L grade 4
PlanMedicare Advantage
EpisodeMSK-2026-0148
01Find + triagearthritisrisk.com

Mechanical, not inflammatory.

A two-minute screener sorts the knee pain: mechanical OA, not an inflammatory arthritis — the right patient for a conservative-first pathway, not a straight-to-surgery referral. Routed accordingly.

◆ RECEIPT   triage · checked by ICD-10 rule set · M17.11 R primary OA of knee · attested R. Vance (patient) · sha256 a1f3…9c02

She understands the options before anyone operates.

The knee-OA class — what the diagnosis means, what conservative care can and can’t do, when surgery is warranted — completed before a surgical decision. Informed, on the record.

◆ RECEIPT   education · module “Knee OA & your options” completed · attested R. Vance (patient) · sha256 7b40…11de
03Track + measurejointcoach.com

Twelve weeks of conservative care — measured, not assumed.

Home-exercise RTM with a validated outcome captured at baseline and follow-up: KOOS-JR 42 → 44 after 12 weeks — minimal functional gain despite documented adherence. Conservative care given a fair, measured trial; now a surgical candidate on evidence, not a hunch. This is the PRO the value-based contract pays on.

◆ RECEIPT   PROM · checked by KOOS-JR scoring · baseline 42 → 44 (Δ+2) · adherence 81% · attested PT, license on file · sha256 c9a2…4f70
04Operate · code · attestsurgeonvalue.com

The surgeon codes it — and an engine, not the model, checks it.

TKA performed. The op-note reads as 27447; the model proposes the codes and quotes the supporting line, then the deterministic CMS NCCI engine checks each one — the model does not grade its own work — and the surgeon signs. One code came back a caution to resolve before submission.

◆ RECEIPT   coding · checked by CMS NCCI (Q1 2025) · 27447 clean · G2211 not-pair-checkable · attested surgeon, license on file · sha256 e75b…81c0
The record · solvinghealth · comfortcard

Five steps. Four receipts. One episode record.

Nothing above lives in a silo. Each step emitted a receipt — what was proposed, what external source verified it, who signed, and a hash that seals it — and they chain into a single longitudinal record of the whole episode, from first symptom to final code.

triage a1f3 education 7b40 PROM c9a2 coding e75b → episode MSK-2026-0148

The model read; an external check said yes or no at every step; a named human signed; a hash made it tamper-evident. PHI never left the record — the proof travels, the note stays home.

Who buys this

The party at risk for the whole episode.

Not the surgeon (buys coding) or the PT (buys tracking). The risk-bearing entity — the ACO, the ACCESS participant, the bundle-holder, the provider-owned plan — is the only one who needs the entire record:

This is the harness, walked end to end.

The homepage shows the network. This shows one patient moving through it — every output seen, every signer controlled, the whole audit trail owned. Where does that check live in your stack?

arthritisrisk → jointclass → jointcoach → surgeonvalue → solvinghealth — four roles, one attested MSK record.
Synthetic patient, illustrative figures; receipts and hashes shown for demonstration. Not coding, billing, or medical advice.